Member-only story

People Always Make War When They Say They Love Peace: A Critical Analysis

Ashton Reed

·6.3k Followers· Follow

Published in Touch And Go: People Always Make War When They Say They Love Peace

5 min read

978 View Claps

55 Respond

Save

Listen

War and peace have been intertwined throughout human history, often presenting a paradoxical and contradictory reality. While many individuals and nations claim to advocate for peace, conflicts continue to erupt around the globe, leaving behind countless lives lost and societies torn apart. This article aims to explore this complex relationship between war and peace, examining the reasons why people often resort to violence even while professing their love for tranquility.

Throughout history, numerous examples can be found of leaders and nations justifying war in the name of peace. During World War I, both sides claimed to be fighting for the preservation of peace and the protection of their respective homelands. However, as the conflict escalated, it became clear that the underlying motivations were far more complex and often rooted in political ambitions, economic interests, and territorial disputes.

Similarly, in the case of the Vietnam War, the United States government portrayed its involvement as a necessary step to prevent the spread of communism and ensure peace in Southeast Asia. However, the war's devastating consequences for the Vietnamese people and the long-term instability it created in the region call into question the sincerity of these claims.

Touch and Go: "People always make war when they say they love peace."

by Michael McClure

4.4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	164 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	72 pages

Philosophical perspectives on the relationship between war and peace offer further insights into this complex issue. Some philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant, have argued that war is an inherently irrational and immoral act. Kant believed that peace is the natural state of human existence and that war can only be justified as a last resort in the defense of one's own rights or to prevent greater harm.

Other philosophers, such as Carl von Clausewitz, have taken a more pragmatic view of war, seeing it as a necessary tool in certain situations. Clausewitz argued that war is a continuation of politics by other means and that it can be justified as a means of achieving political goals or protecting national interests.

Beyond historical and philosophical factors, psychological and cognitive factors also play a significant role in shaping people's attitudes towards war and peace. Research in social psychology has shown that individuals are more likely to support war when they perceive a threat to their own safety or identity. Fear, anger, and prejudice can cloud people's judgment, making them more susceptible to propaganda and less likely to question the justifications for war.

Additionally, cognitive biases such as the availability heuristic and the confirmation bias can lead people to overestimate the likelihood of threats and to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs about war and peace. These biases can make it difficult to have nuanced and informed discussions about these complex issues.

In light of the complex relationship between war and peace, it is essential to move beyond simplistic narratives that portray one as inherently good and the other as inherently evil. Instead, we need to adopt a more nuanced and compassionate approach that recognizes the multifaceted causes of conflict and the challenges of building lasting peace.

This approach involves:

Critical thinking: Questioning assumptions about war and peace and examining the underlying motivations and consequences of armed conflict.
Empathy: Understanding the perspectives of those affected by war, including civilians, soldiers, and refugees.
Dialogue: Engaging in constructive conversations with diverse viewpoints, fostering mutual understanding and seeking common ground.
Investment in peacebuilding: Supporting initiatives that promote peace, justice, and human rights, from grassroots efforts to international organizations.

The phrase "people always make war when they say they love peace" is a sobering reminder of the paradoxical nature of human conflict. While the desire for peace is universal, the reality is often more complex and fraught with contradictions. By critically analyzing the historical, philosophical, psychological, and cognitive factors that contribute to war, we can gain a deeper understanding of this complex issue and work towards creating a more just and peaceful world.

Remember, peace is not merely the absence of war, but a positive state of well-being, justice, and harmony. It requires active engagement, empathy, and a commitment to building a better future for all. By embracing a more nuanced and compassionate approach, we can create a world where war is no longer an inevitable consequence of human nature, but a relic of the past.

Touch and Go: "People always make war when they say they love peace."

by Michael McClure

4.4 out of 5